"There are, at the latest count, four distinct voices in my head. First, of course, if the jabber of money, which might be represented as the blur on the top rung of a typewriter--$%$^$^^&&&@$--sums, subtractions, compound terrors and greeds. Second is the voice of pornography. This often sounds like the rap of a demented DJ: the way she moves has got to be good news, can't get loose till I feel the juice--suck and spread, bitch, yeah bounce for me baby...And so on. (One of the subvoices of pornography in my head is the voice of an obsessed black tramp or retard who roams Times Square beat here in New York. Incomprehensible, yet unmistakenly lecherous, his gurgled monologue goes like this: Uh geh guh yuh tih ah fuh yuh uh yuh fuh ah ah yuh guh suh muh fuh cuh. I do a lot of that kind of talking in my head too.)" pg. 104
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Money 2--The Voice(s) of John Self
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Dinero--First Impressions o' Money
Martin Amis’s Money chronicles the hedonistic exploits of
John Self, a wealthy British advertising executive who spends his time between
New York City and London. He’s a wealthy man, and he puts his cash to good use;
in the sense that there’s always a new form of pleasure being offered by
society that he can fit the bill for. He drinks and smokes constantly; even
saying at one point “Unless I say otherwise, I am always smoking a cigarette.”.
He’s a self admitted fatty who likes to get into drunken bar fights with
strangers, and more often than not he wins. He has a penchant for violence of
pretty much all kinds, and admits to the occasional violent act towards his
female sexual partners, which compounds of course with his general lack of
respect for the female sex.
The interesting thing about Self is, that unlike
other wealthy transgressive characters (like our infamous Patrick Bateman, for
example), he doesn’t seem to draw any dividing lines between high and low
quality excess. He gorges himself on cheap fast food, and spends tokens at
Porn-Palaces, when it’s clear he could easily afford an expensive meal, or an
escort. Relating to John Self as a character is made somewhat more difficult
because of this, at least for me. The one thing I found the most fascinating
about Self, is that all of his existing relationships with other people depend
on money. Whether with the fastidious bellhop Felix, or with the beautiful
Selina, an exchange of money is always involved. Originally, this made me feel
a level of pity for Self, but as I continued to read further into his character
I began to see that it would be extremely unlikely for anyone to choose to have
this guy around, if it weren’t for money.
He’s extremely witty, and seemingly
because of his jaunts into the moral underground, he knows exactly what to say
and do to please and exasperate people. At first I saw him as just another
gleeful explorer into the excesses of modern society, but now I see he’s quite
a powerful figure. It’s interesting to see how Amis has placed himself in the
novel, in the form of that “creepy writer” who lives on John Selfs block in
London; which is very different than Ballards method of placing himself in the
novel. It’s a pretty funny idea for an author to imagine a character seeing
them as a creepy neighbor with stalkerish tendencies.
“I weepily gathered my street clothes and crammed them into
the duty free bag. I hit Sixty Sixth street in a sweat-looped tank top, knee
length Bermudas, black socks and squelchy gyms. Come to think of it, I must
have looked exactly like everyone else. My body craved darkness and silence but
the suns controls were all turned up full blast as I screamed for cabs in the
yellow riot of Broadway.”
This passage stood out to me because of the very powerful
yet bizarre imagery. The manner in which he describes his appearance sounds
gross, and generally just strange; then he goes on to say, he must have looked
like everyone else, which gives the scene a strange, somewhat alien tone. The
most unique use of language in this passage is definitely in reference to the
“yellow riot” of Broadway. By use of such words like “weepily” and “craving
darkness”, we get a powerful image of a defeated, somewhat emasculated Self after
an embarrassing tennis match.
This image is unique in that it not only makes us
pity this otherwise non-pitiable character, but that it juxtaposes this with an
idea of him struggling in the chaos of same-ness; wearing sweaty clothes that
make him look just as everyone else does, and fighting to get a single taxi
within an entire ‘yellow riot’.
Cronenberg's angry because Paul Haggis stole his movie title, and then made a flick about sassy coppers and human trafficking
I have to give Cronenberg credit; J.G. Ballards novel would be difficult at best to transcribe into film. While I'm a big fan of Cronenbergs other movies, such as Scanners and Videodrome, it was difficult for me to accept his interpretation of the novel. It's hard to translate some of the fantastically large scale mental images of structurally complex underpasses and overpasses, of miles of highway stretching endlessly out of and into the city. It just felt as though the film struggled to convey that sense of unease and other-ness that the setting in the novel does. Even though Cronenberg does a good job avoiding typical pedestrian areas, it still cannot be as striking and isolated as Ballard's images are. I also found that while the movie didn't really shy away from the sex and the violence, the combined sexual arousal because of violence didn't disturb me as it did in the novel. It's difficult for actors to really portray the kind of detachment that comes with a violent paraphilia, and so at times their car-sex seemed more like bored gropings and less like a "new sexuality born of a perverse technology". I feel as though any other director given this task would probably not do a very good job; while I can't say I was that into Cronenbergs adaptation, he did a fairly good job at transcribing a book whose plot isn't really that structurally defined. Also, the setting of Toronto kind of blew it a bit for me.
Crash---Ze Conclusion
Crash is a novel that's heavily laden with symbols of sex and violence; symbols that seek to correspond to the various ways in which technology has changed human psychology. Upon finishing Crash, I was reminded of one of our earlier class discussions where we discussed the concept of the consumer as an addict. The various fascinations in the novel with the permanent divinity of celebrity, as well as the uncontrolled violence of automobile accidents seem to mirror the various obsessions of consumer culture; technology, celebrity, death. I find it interesting that Ballard was once quoted in reference to his motivations for this novel as saying "I wanted to rub the human face in its own vomit, and force it to look in the mirror.". Its interesting to think that Ballard was already so disgusted with human submission, or transformation via technology in a year when technologies like the barcode had only been around for a few months. In our current era there would be a million jumping off points for writing a novel about the ills of technology. It was also interesting for me to consider the effect that the European recession as a result of a 200% increase in the price of oil by OPEC possibly had on Ballard in writing a novel about the dire effects of technology. Maybe seeing long line ups like this at gas stations around the UK inspired some mental images of "Automaggedon" for Ballard.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)